Discussion 4 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 2

Discussion 4 - Assignment archetypeFor the second idea, Cose gives the fact of the passing of the McCarran-Walter Act in 1952 which removed racial restrictions in U.S. citizenship and its connection to the blur definition of whiteness (113).How article supports its side of the issue The article supports its side by using anecdotical experience and personal analysis of the present vagueness and purposes of Americas whiteness Identity and by crack historical examples and law that assert the difficulty of defining and defending whiteness.Holes in arguments Cose fails to acknowledge and to respond to replica arguments, specifically that in-migration trends do have biased racial and ethnic beliefs and practices that challenge Americas White Identity.Good counterarguments A good counterargument is 1) Immigration trends do challenge Americas White Identity because of intermarriage and 2) Immigration dilutes whiteness boundaries through diversity in public institutions.Examples of bias, propaganda Cose fails to analyze the central racism and ethnocentricism that come with the formation and protection of Americas White Identity, which can either be seen as a bias for non-whiteness or simply a propaganda to disregard racism in immigration.I agree that immigration patterns challenge Americas white identity because of intermarriage that reduces white homogeneity, and because immigration improves diversity in American society, which reduces the relevance of defining and promoting a white American identity. First, intermarriage across racial and ethnic groups makes it harder to define what is white. By category, a white second-generation American with a dark Hindi mother and a white Latino father, for instance, is white and not white, depending on how he explains his identity. Intermarriage blurs the theory of whiteness in American identity.Second, immigration improves diversity in American society which makes whiteness