Israel †Lebanon War and related problems faced by the American community Essay Example for Free

Israel Lebanon struggle and related capers faced by the American community Es set upIntroduction At the time of iciness war, democratic humans was, virtually, confronted by only one threat, coming from communist regime of the Soviet Union. This foe, though being dangerous, was quite predictable and civilized to certain ex cristalt. After the c overage war seized it seemed that public would in conclusion find global peace and mutual consent. However, things acted different and such hopes vanished into a thin air. The initiation community faced juvenile, formerly unwitnessed, threats related to religious, national, and ethnic intolerance. Commonly accepted, though ultimately mistaken, is the belief that the combat against these threats must be narrowed down to the war against a particular enemy, human race terrorism. Comparing the senile and new world (time before and after the cold war) it must be say that confrontation betwixt democratic world and the Soviet Union was based on certain observes, preventing the world from the global conflict. oppositeness with a new enemy has no rules at all.It turns out that to settle a conflict of a new type is more difficult than it used to be, partially because of the reason that sometimes it is, practically, impossible to find a real initiator of a conflict. All participators of a conflict are guilty. Besides, among the other important reasons is the great number of conflicting parties and, as a consequence, there is a highly complicated interlacement of interests. To defend interests of one party without neglecting the interests of another one is almost an un luck intoable aim.The bright example of the conflict of new type is a currently continuing war between Israel and Lebanon. This war affects the events all over the world and American community in particular. Israel Lebanon war raises an get down of problems that need to be solved by the world leaders as soon as possible. Short Historical Back ground It is reported that on 12 July 2006 al-Jihad initiated Operation Truthful Promise named for a promise by its leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah to enthral Israeli soldiers and swap them for the remaining three Lebanese held by Israel.The early morning raid into Israeli territorial dominion resulted in eight Israeli soldiers killed and two captured. Israel then responded with Operation Just Reward by and by renamed Operation Change of Direction. Israels retaliatory strike has thus far encompassed bombing raids by the Israeli phone line Force (IAF), an air and Israeli Sea Corps naval blockade of Lebanon (especially southern Lebanon and Beirut), a propel of tanks and armored personnel carriers, and some small raids into southern Lebanon by Israel Defense Forces (IDF) ground troops.al-Jihad has simultaneously engaged in extensive rocket attacks on Israels northern cities, including Haifa. However, the Lebanese establishment has constantly disavowed Hezbollahs actions and refused to pass over them, while urgently calling for international peacemakers to end the conflict. (Wikipedia) This short passage gives a clear and boilersuit picture of the background of current situation in Middle East. It must be noted that Hezbollah operations on Israeli soldiers capture was preceded by Israel descent of the west bank of the Jordan River and Gaza Strip.This occupation was in its turn preceded by Hamas raid into Israel and capture of an Israeli soldier (CNN. com) This bundle of events can be untwined to infinity. summary of events and their projection at US Foreign polity The world community acknowledges that Hezbollah is a terrorist brass which directs its actions against Israeli state. Respectively, no one denies Israels right to protect itself and its citizens as well as no one rejects Israels demand to disarm or destroy this organization.However, Hezbollah located its armament camps on the territory of sovereign state of Lebanon, the government of which is, virtually, incapable to control the activity of this organization. Now the issue of Israel self-defense arises from a different perspective is Israel authorized to conduct array actions against terrorist organization on the territory of a sovereign awkward? And if initially most countries justified Israels actions, civilian casualties made the world be divided basing on its reaction to the Middle East conflict. As it is stated in the article at CNN.com leaders in Europe and the Middle East see the attacks against Lebanon as disproportionate and this statement provokes a new question at what exactly moment these attacks became disproportionate and Israel self-defence transformed into aggression? When ten civilians were killed or twenty? This question is not a simple one as it raises the global problem of the right to resort to weapon against certain country. It is directly related to the American community and to get into the get back of the matter it would be useful to consent recourse to the investigation of the question of the legality of the regular army incursion into Iraq.Speaking about military infringement legality, as Crahan states, the answer may seem obvious the U. N. is the worlds premier political consistency, its Charter requires earnest Council authorization for the use of tug . (Crahan et al. , p. 135) No one can disagree with this statement. The situation in which the force can be use is also obvious there should be continuous failure to execute resolving powers, carried by UN Security Council, or their systematic violation.In particular, what concerns Iraq, there was an array of resolutions carried, which Iraq refused to execute. But it is demand to clarify was it solely Iraqs fault? As Crahan further continues the world body had failed in all those years to attain the goals that the President was seeking, in large part because the Council was bitterly and chronically divided on the critical question of how sometimes even on whether to enforce its numerous resolutions on Iraq. (Crahan et al., 135) therefrom it follows that the Council, while carrying its resolutions, even if under the pressure from U. S. side, itself resists their execution. Here the EC countries and Russia are to be richly reproached. No country in the world would execute every resolutions in such circumstances. However, when it came to the point when acts of force were very likely, Iraq, nevertheless, began to execute U. N. Security Council resolutions. But this time the USA and allies decided to launch the invasion with complete neglect to international law .Such total neglect to the Council resolutions, even by its stable members, caused the situation where UN Council turned into a fake organization, unable to solve global conflicts. Now it is time to hap to the case with Israel-Lebanon war, which is more complicated. It should be noted that this war is, virtually, the war of radical Arabs against Israeli country where, unfort unately, smooth civilians have to suffer. The UN Security Council has passed corresponding resolutions against both enemy parties Hezbollah organization and Israel.It must be discover that UN Security Council also passed the resolution concerning Hezbollah in 2004 , however, two years passed and it still was not applied either. Failure to fulfill this requirement was a formal ground for Israel to attack the territory of Lebanon. Moreover, the Security console of Israel agreed Israel allow not give up its demand for Lebanon to implement U. N. resolution 1559, which calls for the disarmament of Hezbollah and any other militias, and the deployment of the Lebanese army in south Lebanon.(www. gopusa. com) However, scrutinizing this war in the context of the Arabs war against Israel, one should notice, that Israel made it its convention to violate UN resolutions as related to its enemies. It is necessary to mention the resolutions, the ground of which is the principle of land for pe ace (See resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973), 1397 (2002) and 1515(2003) at Global Policy forum, July 13 2006). Also it must be noted that Hezbollah movement is support by Syria and Iran.Syria regards Israel as enemy country due to the Israels occupation of Golan Heights, territory of Syria. The cessation of occupation of these territories, according to the land for peace resolution, would stop Syrias support of Hezbollah. beta in that confrontation is the position of the USA. One should mention Council resolution, vetoed by US, which was forwarded by Qatar as of July 13 2006. round excerpts from this resolution are relevant hereThe Security Council, Reaffirming all its relevant resolutions, in particular, 242 (1967), 338 (1973), 1397 (2002) and 1515(2003), Condemning military assault being carried out by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Gaza Strip, which has caused the killing and injury of dozens of Palestinian civilians, and the closing of Palestinian property and civilian infrastructure, notably Gazas main power station, and condemning also the clutch of democratically elected Palestinian and other falseicials, Condemning also the firing of rockets from Gaza into.Israel and the abduction of an Israeli soldier by Palestinian armed groups from Gaza, and the recent abduction and killing of an Israeli civilian in the West Bank, Calls for the immediate and unqualified release of the abducted Israeli soldier Calls upon the Palestinian Authority to take immediate and sustained action to mould an end to violence, including the firing of rockets on Israeli territory (Global Policy meeting place, July 13 2006) What exactly in this resolution was unacceptable for Bushs administration that take a leakd it to veto the given resolution?Was not it the particular that the resolution one more time reminded of systematic UN Council resolutions violation by Israel? Was not it a reflection of double standards? The idea on this issue is clearly expressed in the a rticle The Economist Israel ignores the joined Nations and has weapons of mass destruction. So why all the fuss about Iraq? Soon after invading capital of Kuwait in 1990, Saddam Hussein realized that he had made a mistake. But as the world debates the merits of another American-led war against Mr. Hussein, the idea has returned in a new form. Israel has violated countless UN resolutions and amassed weapons of mass destruction, say those who oppose this war.Why then is Iraq singled out for yet more punishment while the Israelis get off scot-free? (www. economist. com, 2002). These question remains without answer. The analogy can be drawn between the case with Hezbollah and Israel and the fashion of a armament as regards a thief. If a thief (Hezbollah) breaks into someones house (Israel) so what shall a swarm do? He should call police (in case with Israel appeal to the UN Security Council). And what does the host do? He starts striking with his axe destroying everything on his authority, including innocent neighbours. But as it turns out the host is himself on the wanted list for countless criminal offences (resolutions violation).What is then in this situation a host, victim or criminal? And who is to be protected by police (by the USA)? Exactly such inconsistency between the crime and punishment, elevation of one party and humiliation of another, provokes the Muslim world to hate the U. S. insurance. Israels actions are treated by Arab countries as a challenge to the whole Muslim world. The USA and its citizens began to be looked at as Israels supporters who can disregard and manipulate international law leaning on their military and sparing might. For a common American citizen this is a terrible situation. In any place of the world he or she becomes an object of hatred.US governments attempt to protect its people in military manner (in Iraq) and ignoring Israels aggression created the situation when neither in Europe nor even at central office the Americans can feel safe (9/11 events). In other words, military methods, unapproved by world community, in fact, helped to solve Iraq or Hezbollah problems but immediately generated many other problems. But will Israel attain its aim (peace and remove the threat) when civilians die? Most probably it will not, while killed Hezbollah militants will be replaced by others those, who formerly were peaceful civilians but began to hate Israel because of bombings and there will be the same old story again.The way out from this predicament is to defend not only the interests of own nation and citizens but stand upon the values common to all mankind. Thus Israel defends its citizens by bombing Lebanon but it does not disquiet for dying civilians what leads to conflict escalation . Like Israel, other countries are not governed by human values too. Thus BBC reporting on the evacuation of civilians from Lebanon states A British warship has dropped off 180 UK citizens in Cyprus, and is go to B eirut to pick up more people, A Norwegian ferry has taken hundreds of Norwegians, Swedes and Americans to Cyprus, while a US-chartered ship has left Beirut with US citizens (BBC News). The immediate question arises should not they take first women and children from the territory of conflict?Only when American community realizes that human values are more important than any other, national, religious, ethnic or racial interests, and politicians adhere to this principle, only then the attitude of the world towards the USA and its citizens will change. Another aspect, that American community is confronted with, is constantly increasing military expenses. One can extirpate radicalism and extremism by military means but there is also a chance first to find reasons that induce extremism and then try to eliminate these reasons. Thus Ahmad S. Mousalli in the article Islamist Perspectives of Regime Political Response The Cases of Lebanon and promised land claims that Israel, Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Palestine are plagued, in one way or another, with poverty, inflation, underemployment, and exploitation. legion(predicate) Palestinians or Egyptians, for instance, may turn to Islamism because of the corruption of their political elites, exploitation of the nouveau riche, nepotism, favoritism and the like. (1996, 53) In this view the part of expenses, spent on army, could have been directed to support and reorganize economy of the Middle East countries. One more thing that deserves American communitys attention is that while possessing the veto power in UN Security Council, the US government abuses its power. To prove it there is a table below which shows the frequency of the use of the veto in the Security Council by different countries during the last decade. Period China* France Britain US Russia Total 2006 1 1 2005.2004 2 1 3 2003 2 2 2002 2 2 2001 2 2 2000 0 1999 1 1 1998 0 1997 1 2 3 1996 0 Table is taken from Glob al Policy Forum Changing Patterns in the Use of the Veto in the Security Council Retrieved from http//globalpolicy. igc. org/ certification/data/vetotab. htm The USA has a strong leading position in this table. This table is the confirmation of the avocation statement Many member states have expressed their criticism of the veto, arguing that the veto privilege is an anachronism responsible for more than of the Security Councils undemocratic and ineffective procedures.Not surprisingly, those enjoying the power of the veto dont want to give it up. (Global Policy Forum The Power of the Veto) So, the countries with veto power in Security Council should abandon it. Conclusion The situation well-nigh Israel and Lebanon is not an exceptional one it reflects the general tension in the world. This war only confirms that the world policy desperately needs revision. It is necessary to establish new world order and the USA has to head this process. internationalistic relations must be esta blished upon the principles different from those existing today, in particular, economically powerful country while taking any actions is obliged to take into account the interests of less developed countries.To settle conflicts it is necessary to resume the authority of United Nations and entitle it to make decisions as regards resorting to force in conflict settlement. The resolutions carried by this organization must be mandatory to all countries. This conclusion can be best supported by words uttered by the ex-president of the USA immediately after the cold war a new era-freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony a world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle where the strong respect the rights of the weak. (Miller, Yetiv 2001, 56) Unfortunately, in 15 year period following that speech news l ine on BBC says The USA is going to accelerate military supplies of high-precision missiles to Israel. (BBC News) This is exactly the way George Bush junior and Israel decided to realize Bush seniors dream of the harmony in the world. Works Cited BBC News Dozens die in fresh Lebanon raids BBC News 19 July 2006. 22 July 2006 http//news. bbc. co. uk/2/hi/middle_east/5193662. stm.Crahan, Margaret E. , Goering John, and Weiss Thomas G. struggles on Terrorism and Iraq Human Rights, Unilateralism, and U. S. Foreign Policy. New York Routledge, 2004. Global Policy Forum Draft Resolution Proposed by Qatar, Vetoed By US.. July 13, 2006 http//globalpolicy. igc. org/ trade protection/issues/israel-palestine/un/2006/0714draft. htmGlobal Policy Forum The Power of the Veto. July 2006 http//globalpolicy. igc. org/security/membship/veto. htm Global Policy Forum Changing Patterns in the Use of the Veto in the Security Council July 2006 http//globalpolicy. igc. org/security/data/vetotab. htm Hezboll ah battle along border. United Press International. Gopusa Israel. 19 July 2006 http//www. gopusa. com/news/2006/july/0719_israel_hezbollah. shtml.Kirkwood-Tucker, Toni Fuss. Germanys Opposition to the Iraq War and Its Effect on U. S. -German Relations. Social Education. 68. 4 (2004) 285+. Labott, Elise U. S. diplomatic options limited in Israel-Lebanon conflict. CNN. com Jul 15, 2006.22 July 2006 http//www. cnn. com/2006/WORLD/meast/07/15/btsc. labott. diplomacy Miller, Eric A. , and Yetiv Steve A. The New World Order in Theory and Practice The Bush Administrations Worldview in Transition. presidential Studies Quarterly 31. 1 (2001) 56. Mousalli, Ahmad S. Islamist Perspectives of Regime Political Response The Cases of Lebanon and Palestine. Arab Studies Quarterly 18. 3 (1996) 53+. Press expelling SC/8181. Security Council. 09 Feb. 2004 http//www. un. org/News/Press/docs/2004/sc8181. doc. htm. 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 22 July 2006 http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/2006_Israel-Lebanon_conflict